Bud Selig is crazy…crazy like a fox. The bumbling car peddler
managed his way to the head of the owners’ table and put together a coalition of
merry men who engineered the biggest transfer of wealth since Lenin's crew. With the
Steinbrenners and their ilk long since conquered, now it seems his sights are focused
on the other group with whom he must share the proceeds of his profitable sport,
the MLBPA, and he has a big stick.
Major League baseball players face a Catch-22 on demands
from their union. On the one hand they want the drug cheaters exposed and
punished, if not ousted altogether. There are fewer than one thousand major
league jobs and earning one and keeping it is brutally competitive and entirely
performance driven. Players pumped up from PEDs literally threaten the jobs of
those who choose to play by the rules. Conversely, players need the assurance of reasonable rights to privacy, and due process in any
and all disciplinary actions. It is likely that right now the rank and file
better understand, or at least are more responsive to, the former—it’s an
emotional issue. But union leadership, distinctly in the tradition of Marvin
Miller, understood that without the latter the owners via the Commissioner’s
office could and would run roughshod over them—for a case in point witness Goodell’s
NFL. The MLBPA has long maintained solidarity on nearly every issue, mostly
falling in lock step with leadership’s propositions. That has served them well,
especially when comparing their negotiated outcomes to the other sport
unions. Nevertheless, PEDS policy may come
to be the divisive issue. More importantly is the Commissioner’s push toward
increasingly hard line policies motivated by a desire to split and bust the
union? That’s what Miller thought—he viewed the drug testing frenzy as a “witch hunt” (H/T Edge of Sports).
Nonetheless, if the players want a “clean” game they have the right to it and what constitutes
banned substances should be at their collective discretion and really no one
else’s. One should not feel pressured to imbibe to get or hold a job,
especially when the substance is potentially dangerous and life threatening. Indeed, when it comes to banned substances,
isn’t safety the only legitimate concern for what is and is not allowed? The
problem is, with few exceptions, there is no clear and known line between the safe
and unsafe. Substance policy at all levels instead follows a ridiculous pattern
of taxonomy: if the substance is like medicine and heals one back to normal… no
problem. However, if the junk is like a drug that makes a person better than
normal, or to feel that way, it must be outlawed. No matter that a single substance, anabolic steroids
or marijuana for example, can do both depending on the situation. But even if
it could be known with certainty what substances should be, or need not be banned,
the enforcement process becomes the worst sort of quandary. Nowhere are privacy
rights and due process in more jeopardy than with drug testing. Yet, without testing
the proscriptions have no teeth at all. On what side then does an athlete come
down? If your career and livelihood are at stake it’s a dilemma, and one that can be exploited. Why is the hysteria over
Biogenesis so baseball specific, when athletes from other sports were implicated
too? As a union busting strategy, it fits all too well a familiar pattern of
divide and conquer. An unpopular
antihero emerges to be the public face of the scandal, the other fingered desperados
fit nicely along a vulnerable racial and ethnic divide—from Biogenesis all
but two found culpable are Dominican. As Dave Zirin points out, it is white US-born
players who are the most aggressively outspoken regarding their disapproval of
PEDS.
Perhaps Selig’s hardline is all about his legacy and reversing
his image from being remembered as the “steroid
Commissioner” to the righteous savior of the game from drugs. But seriously,
this is a man who seems to care nothing for his public image in any other
context. Every move he has made as Commissioner
has been motivated by shifting the wealth of others his way, and that’s exactly
what will result from a diminished union.
No comments:
Post a Comment